Director: Icíar Bollaín --- Main Cast : Luis Tosar, Gael García Bernal, Karra Elejalde, Raúl Arévalo, Cassandra Ciangherotti, Carlos Santos, Carlos Aduviri, Dani Currás . ---
Argument: A film crew, predominantly English, but with American funding, which employs a team composed of people of different nationalities Hispanic Bolivian land travel in 2000, just beginning confrontations between indigenous communities and authorities.
The reason is that the government does not want to give that community access to potable water, even leaves collect rain water.
Thus, in this situation, the shooting will become a litmus test for the deepest convictions of the crew, where an infidel and you stand back from any producer and director idealistic. ---
My opinion: Estimable co-production between Spain, France and Mexico, which has undoubted interest from the standpoint of film and socio-political and historical.
His proposals, which is told, even though the events took place many years ago, sadly still highly topical negative. It may have been advanced, but the depth of human being, that we soyuzgar often leads to the neighbor, is still immersed in our hearts. But also, happily, there is solidarity, respect, friendship ...
"T lso rain" has more value in the mind that tells how. By this I mean that while the film is good, entertaining and even a thrilling moment in general has been, in my view, lower than advertised. It is well worth it, but not as good as has been said there. In this sense, I think Icíar Bollaín have better jobs, maybe more modest, but better finishes.
And, the ambition of the proposal is large and sometimes the speech is about action, being moments sometimes, though perhaps necessary if it has been tried "culturize the audience, ensures that the pace will slow somewhat.
is therefore, somewhat irregular, and there are peaks of interest which makes the final score does not reach the significant or, if you just remarkable.
And you notice that could have gotten more, being somewhat blurred when precisely necetitaba more excitement, more rhythm, as in the final third, somewhat subdued, perhaps because of the budget that was available. The end does not become cold but it is something schematic and unemotional, but perhaps the simplicity is what the director wanted.
In short, I liked but also somewhat disappointed me a little. Just expected more .
is therefore, somewhat irregular, and there are peaks of interest which makes the final score does not reach the significant or, if you just remarkable.
And you notice that could have gotten more, being somewhat blurred when precisely necetitaba more excitement, more rhythm, as in the final third, somewhat subdued, perhaps because of the budget that was available. The end does not become cold but it is something schematic and unemotional, but perhaps the simplicity is what the director wanted.
In short, I liked but also somewhat disappointed me a little. Just expected more .
